When Prince Harry and Meghan Markle welcomed their daughter in June 2021, they announced her name as Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. The choice immediately drew global attention because “Lilibet” was not a typical royal name. It held deep personal significance within the British royal family and had been associated with Queen Elizabeth II since her early childhood.
According to publicly documented royal history, “Lilibet” originated from the Queen’s attempts as a young child to pronounce her own name. The affectionate nickname was used primarily by close family members and remained a private, personal term throughout her life.
Because of the name’s strong historical and emotional ties to the late monarch, the announcement understandably generated wide public interest and discussion. In the days and weeks that followed, different media outlets and commentators examined how the choice was made, what the name symbolized, and whether the Queen had been consulted beforehand. With the topic resurfacing occasionally in public commentary, it remains one of the more personal episodes in modern royal reporting.
A Name With Deep Royal Significance
“Lilibet” is widely recognized as Queen Elizabeth II’s lifelong nickname. Historical biographies and official royal archives note that the name began within her immediate family when she was a toddler. It appeared in letters exchanged among close relatives and was used by people who were part of her private life.
Because the nickname was closely linked to the Queen’s personal history, it carried symbolic weight when Harry and Meghan chose it for their daughter. Public reaction reflected an understanding that the name represented both affection and legacy, two themes that had shaped the Queen’s decades on the throne.
Reports About Whether the Queen Approved the Name
Shortly after the birth announcement, questions arose in the public conversation about whether the couple had consulted Queen Elizabeth II about using the name. Media outlets at the time published different accounts:
Statements from Harry and Meghan
A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, as reported by major outlets such as BBC News and People Magazine, stated that:
- Prince Harry contacted the Queen shortly before the announcement.
- The couple would not have used the name without her support.
Reports of differing interpretations
Some media reports, including a BBC report published at the time, stated that palace sources had conveyed a different view about whether formal permission had been requested. The BBC later clarified that the report was based on information from a palace source rather than direct statements from the Queen.
Royal biography commentary
Royal author Robert Hardman, known for writing detailed, sourced works on the monarchy, discussed the topic in his book Charles III: New King, New Court, The Inside Story. He noted that individuals close to the Queen had differing understandings of how the naming decision was communicated. Hardman’s reporting reflects commentary from sources he interviewed, not official palace statements.
None of these accounts provide definitive evidence of what the Queen personally felt or said. What is documented is that multiple reputable news organizations reported differing perspectives based on their sources, while the Sussexes maintained that they had her support.
To date, there has been no official statement from Buckingham Palace confirming or denying the specifics of the conversation.
Public Commentary and the Trademark Discussion
The topic resurfaced when royal commentator Angela Levin discussed the name during an appearance on GB News. She expressed personal criticism of the couple and raised questions about whether the name had been registered for trademark purposes. Trademark filings are public records, and according to searchable public databases, there is no verified record showing that Harry or Meghan trademarked the name “Lilibet” for commercial purposes.
It is common practice for public figures to secure intellectual property protections around their own names or charitable foundations. However, there is no confirmed evidence that “Lilibet” was trademarked by the Sussexes, and established media outlets have not substantiated that claim.
A Personal Decision With Public Impact
The discussion around Lilibet Diana’s name reflects how deeply the public continues to engage with royal history and modern family dynamics. Names carry meaning, especially those connected to a monarch who shaped decades of British life and global perception.
For Harry and Meghan, the choice appears to have been presented as a tribute to two women central to Harry’s life:
- Queen Elizabeth II
- Diana, Princess of Wales
For observers and commentators, the choice prompted broader discussions about tradition, identity, and modern royal roles.
Conclusion
The naming of Lilibet Diana remains a highly discussed topic, not because of controversy alone but because of the cultural and historical importance of the name itself. While differing accounts were reported, the only confirmed information comes from official statements made at the time and publicly verifiable records.
As with many topics involving the royal family, accuracy requires distinguishing between established facts and commentary. Public interest remains strong, but the documented record shows that the most reliable information comes directly from official statements and recognized news organizations.
